Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Where are the New Theories of Organization?
By R. Suddaby, Cynthia Hardy, Quy Nguyen Huy. 2011
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/076e5154746cd2fd8a8309937244b57a8c6b2407
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Joep Cornelissen
- Antonio Daood
- P. Menghwar
- Rodolphe Durand
- Michael L. Tushman
- Rick Delbridge
- Mary J. Benner
- Hans-Gerd Ridder
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- P. Devereaux Jennings
- Joep Cornelissen
- Antonio Daood
- P. Menghwar
- Rodolphe Durand
- Michael L. Tushman
- Rick Delbridge
- Mary J. Benner
Citations in the corpus
- Creating shared value: A systematic review, synthesis and integrative perspective (2021, result): “The second area of research is consistent with the suggestions of Suddaby et al. (2011).”
- Moving Forward: Developing Theoretical Contributions in Management Studies (2014, background): “Many classic theoretical canons such as population ecology, agency theory, transaction cost economics, and institutional theory emerged in the 1970s, but, since then, little real innovation has occurred (e.g., Davis, 2010; Suddaby et al., 2011).”
- Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award—“Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited” Ten Years Later (2015, background): “Echoing Suddaby et al. (2011) and Davis (in press), these theories may be out of date (or “living museums” [Davis, 2010]).”
- The theory contribution of case study research designs (2017, background): “It is argued that the complexity of the reality is not adequately captured (Suddaby et al. 2011).”
- Emotional Arousal and Entrepreneurial Outcomes: Combining Qualitative Methods to Elaborate Theory (2015, background): “This novel recombinant methodology offers a potential template for future researchers interested in addressing recent calls for a less formulaic andmore heterogeneous approach to our understanding of organizational phenomena (Ashkanasy, 2013; Delbridge and Fiss, 2013; Suddaby et al., 2011).”