Comparing Aspiration Models: The Role of Selective Attention

By M. Washburn, Philip Bromiley. 2010

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06b609091df021c4d6e50bd5052121b4d197bcb6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ji-Yub Kim
2. Jerayr Haleblian
3. Sydney Finkelstein
4. Jared D. Harris
5. Philip Bromiley
6. John Joseph
7. Vibha Gaba
8. David Gomulya

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ji-Yub Kim
2. Jerayr Haleblian
3. John Joseph
4. Jared D. Harris
5. Philip Bromiley
6. Vibha Gaba
7. Sydney Finkelstein

In Strategy and Management

1. Sydney Finkelstein
2. Jerayr Haleblian
3. Ji-Yub Kim
4. Vibha Gaba
5. John Joseph
6. Jared D. Harris
7. Philip Bromiley
8. Gavin Cassar

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations (2014, background): “Washburn and Bromiley (2012) use internal targets from an auto manufacturer to compare alternative aspiration models, but the implications of their results for aggregate studies on archival data are unclear.”
• The Fog of Feedback: Ambiguity and Firm Responses to Multiple Aspiration Levels (2015, background): “The different specifications of various aspiration-level models reflect different theoretical assumptions regarding information processing in organizations (Washburn and Bromiley, 2012).”
• All Aspirations are not Created Equal: The Differential Effects of Historical and Social Aspirations on Acquisition Behavior (2014, background): “The recently proposed varying parameters model is promising as it adds realistic assumptions about switching between two aspirations (Bromiley & Harris, 2014; Washburn & Bromiley, 2012).”