¿Push-Pull¿ Factors Influencing International Student Destination Choice

By Tim Mazzarol, Geoffrey N. Soutar. 2002

1,565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06af004d6b21d935da131acf7784ced776b2f98c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Educational Benefits of Travel Experiences (2013, background): “Additionally, the same push–pull motivational factors that entice tourists to visit destinations (Beeton 2006) have been shown to motivate students to study abroad (Eder, Smith, and Pitts 2010; Mazzarol and Soutar 2002).”
International student destination choice: the influence of home campus experience on the decision to consider branch campuses (2011, background): “…in helping higher education institutions (HEIs) in Western countries counter the potential threat of the new international branch campuses and also provides a test of the universally accepted push-pull model of international student destination choice (McMahon, 1992; Mazzarol & Soutar, 2002).”
Student Evaluation of University Image Attractiveness and Its Impact on Student Attachment to International Branch Campuses (2013, neutral): “…Baron, & Harris, 1999; Pampaloni, 2010; Soutar & Turner, 2002) while others have found that interpersonal sources are very influential (Gatfield & Chen, 2006; Kazoleas et al., 2001; Mazzarol & Soutar, 2002; Shanka et al., 2005; Simões & Soares, 2010; Wilkins & Epps, 2011; Wilkins & Huisman, 2011).”
The emergence of a regional hub: comparing international student choices and experiences in South Korea (2014, background): “2009; Kondakci 2011; Li and Bray 2007), most studies have investigated the determinants of international student flows and experiences in developed English-speaking countries (i.e., Chen 2007; Lee 2010; Marginson et al. 2010; Mazzarol and Soutar 2002), despite the fact that growing numbers of intern”
Research on the flow of international students to UK universities (2007, background): “…by expectations of its ability to raise the status of the graduate, both economically and socially, demand for education, particularly higher education, has led to a significant number of students, mostly from developing countries, travelling abroad for their studies (Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002).”
International student recruitment: policies and developments in selected countries (2012, background): “2) A extensive analysis of the different models for domestic students can be found in Vossensteyn, J.J. (2005). Perceptions of Student PriceResponsiveness: A Behavioural Economics Exploration of the Relationships between Socio-Economic Status, Perceptions of Financial Incentives and Student Choice, ”
Educational value: how students choose university: Evidence from an Italian university (2010, background): “Previous studies proved that for international students “push and pull” factors operate along the students’ decision-making process (Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002).”
Understanding friendship and learning networks of international and host students using longitudinal Social Network Analysis (2014, background): “Mazzarol and Soutar (2002) present a push-pull model of international education flows and note that several factors can influence the demand of international education.”
Internationalization or International Marketing? Two Frameworks for Understanding International Students' Choice of Canadian Universities (2008, background): “The factors influencing international students' choice of a host country and institution have been discussed in the domain of internationalization ( Bruch & Barty, 1998 ; Davis, 1997 ; Mazzarol & Soutar, 2002a ) as well as in the domain of marketing ( Binsardi & Ekwulugo, 2003 ; Mazzarol & Soutar”
Choosing Canadian graduate schools from afar: East Asian students’ perspectives (2007, methodology): “Its process is based on Hossler, Brax ton, and Coopersmith's (1989) and Neice and Braun's (1977) three-phase model, and Mazzarol and Soutar's (2002) "push-pull" model.”
What attracts mainland Chinese students to Australian higher education (2007, background): “People’s Republic of China (MOE), 2006; Chen & Zimitat, 2006; Marginson, 2001; Mazzarol & Soutar, 2002 ).”
Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education (2013, background): “…criteria compared to those of international students who choose to study at the main campuses of universities based in Australia, the UK or US (Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002; Binsardi and Ekwulugo, 2003; Pimpa, 2005; Shanka et al., 2005; Gatfield and Chen, 2006; Maringe and Carter, 2007; Wilkins…”
Emerging education hubs: the case of Singapore (2011, background): “…the reputation of the university by international students enrolled at NUS, confirming previous studies undertaken in established education exporters about the importance of academic reputation in student decision making (see Mazzarol and Soutar 2002; Soutar and Turner 2002; Veloutsou et al. 2004).”
International Students' Choice Behavior for Higher Education at (2010, background): “Only a few studies have used international students as their samples, such as Binsardi and Ekwulugo (2003), Hanapi et al (2003) and Mazzarol and Soutar (2002).”