The Function of Personality in Creativity

By Gregory J. Feist. 2010

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/068a702c75c4c8a7ab7b5690f790f311fe491545

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Citations in the corpus

Creativity of Chinese and American Cultures: A Synthetic Analysis. (2013, background): “In addition, they tend to be open-minded and extroverted (and, indeed, most personality research supports this, i.e., Batey & Furnham, 2006; Feist, 2010; King, Walker & Broyles, 1996).”
Ready, Set, Create: What Instructing People to "Be Creative" Reveals About the Meaning and Mechanisms of Divergent Thinking (2014, background): “Although all five factors are interesting for creativity research, we were primarily interested in openness to experience, which plays the biggest role by far in creativity (Feist, 1998, 2010; Kaufman, 2013; Nusbaum & Silvia, 2011b).”
A Five-Dimensional Model of Creativity and its Assessment in Schools (2016, methodology): “These were: (1) Identifying those dispositions or habits of mind at the core of creativity (Claxton, 2006; Feist, 2010; Kaufman & Sternberg, 2010); (2) Being as comprehensive in terms of existing research as possible (Spencer et al., 2012); (3) Achieving overall coherence but at the same time…”
Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. (2015, background): “Most personality traits have some relevance to creativity, such as traits associated with persevering, discerning which ideas are good, and selecting a creative domain (Fürst, Ghisletta, & Lubart, in press), but openness to experience appears to be the global, general factor associated with creativi”
Cantankerous creativity: Honesty–Humility, Agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement (2011, background): “As one of the oldest approaches to creativity research (Barron, 1957), the individual differences approach has uncovered many robust findings as well as some inconsistent findings (Feist, 2010).”
Classroom contexts for creativity (2014, background): “Following Galton, researchers have continued to explore the role that individual factors play in creativity, including cognitive ability (Jauk, Benedek, Dunst, & Neubauer, 2013; Kim, 2005); personality traits such as openness to experience (Feist, 2010); self-beliefs such as belief in one’s creative”
PROGRESSION IN STUDENT CREATIVITY IN SCHOOL: FIRST STEPS TOWARDS NEW FORMS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS (2013, background): “…our framework should be: − Deliberately identifying those dispositions which the literature suggests are at the core of creativity (Claxton, 2006, Feist, 2010, Kaufman and Sternberg, 2010); − Explicitly premised on the ‘grow-ability’ of creative mindedness (Lucas and Claxton, 2010, Perkins,…”