Critiquing Voice as a Viable Pedagogical Tool in L2 Writing: Returning the Spotlight to Ideas.

By Paul Stapleton. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0643325ce3c8055191579d8683f6b79adc9e68bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Jim McKinley
2. C. Tardy
3. Paul Kei Matsuda

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. C. Tardy
2. Paul Kei Matsuda
3. Jim McKinley
4. Dacia Dressen-Hammouda

Citations in the corpus

• Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing (2014, background): “This way of forming an argument is rather common for EFL writers in their attempt to make their writing appear “native” (Stapleton, 2002).”
• Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review (2007, background): “Yet, as soon as the exploration of the notion of voice began, some researchers expressed skepticism toward the importance of voice in academic writing (Helms-Park & Stapleton, 2003; Stapleton, 2002).”