Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review

By Paul Kei Matsuda, C. Tardy. 2007

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8aaffba181a946e2a5efd7ce9cf2b4eb7553301

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Dacia Dressen-Hammouda
2. C. Tardy
3. Paul Kei Matsuda

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Dacia Dressen-Hammouda
2. C. Tardy
3. Paul Kei Matsuda

Citations in the corpus

• From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery (2008, background): “These implicit propositions signal membership and competence to initiated insiders, in ways likely similar to those found by Matsuda and Tardy (2007) in their study of how blind reviewers respond to cues in the text in order to reconstruct writers’ disciplinary identity and levels of competence and…”
• The Construction of Author Voice by Editorial Board Members (2009, methodology): “…this point, researchers may need to rely on reviewers’ self-report, which is typical in studies of blind manuscript reviews (including the present study) or conduct detailed qualitative analyses of a relatively small number of participants, as we did in our previous study (Matsuda & Tardy, 2007).”