The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hope and emotional well-being: A six-year study to distinguish antecedents, correlates, and consequences (2015, background): “…positive youth development – operationalized as children with a high sense of competence, confidence, character, connections to other people, and caring – researchers found that hope scores were the best predictor, outperforming other candidates such as self-regulatory skill (Schmid et al., 2011).”
The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway (2017, methodology): “…(e.g., intentional self-regulation skills, and hope for the future; see, for example, Geldhof, Bowers, Gestsdóttir, Napolitano, & Lerner, 2014a ; Schmid et al., 2011) and consistent negative associations between PYD and indicators of maladaptive development (e.g., depressive symptoms, and…”
Profiles of hope: How clusters of hope relate to school variables (2017, background): “Longitudinal studies have shown hope to be related to life satisfaction after a year (Marques, Lopez, &Mitchell, 2013) and to more favorable developmental trajectories over a three-year span (Schmid et al., 2011).”