Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School
By Chih-Wei Chang, Jih-Hsien Lee, Po-Yao Chao, Chin-Yeh Wang, Gwo-Dong Chen. J. Educ. Technol. Soc., 2010
309 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05df9e2511d9900f7d2a0e9f4cc6b8be8afb001e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Amit Kumar Pandey
- Lai Poh Emily Toh
- Rodolphe Gelin
- Albert J. Causo
- Samuel Spaulding
- Pei-Wen Tzuo
- I-Ming Chen
- Song Huat Yeo
Citations in the corpus
- A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind (2018, background): “In addition, as humanoid robots come to display body language and other abilities that embody human-like social signals, they become capable of being highly engaging [7].”
- A review of the applicability of robots in education (2013, background): “The analysis in [18] is well presented but lacks empirical evidence.”
- Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Children's Second Language Skills (2016, background): “(2009); Chang et al. (2010) or in one-on-one tutoring sessions Saerbeck et al. (2010); Kory, Jeong, and Breazeal (2013); Fridin (2014).”
- Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review (2020, background): “evaluated articles, it is apparent AI application, in education, in its different forms, has accorded learners a richer and more rewarding learning experience [19], [22], [25], [31], [34], [35].”
- A Review on the Use of Robots in Education and Young Children (2016, background): “Robots seem appropriate to use in language skill development because it allow for a richer interaction (Sugimoto, 2011; Chambers et al., 2008; Bers, 2010; Chang et al., 2010; Young et al., 2010).”