It's not easy being green: : the role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues

By Scott Sonenshein, Katherine A. DeCelles, Jane E. Dutton. 2014

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/051c3419a6710188a9a39ee4e34804c0ef124e5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Christine M. Moser
2. Jean‐Pascal Gond
3. Philip M. Podsakoff
4. Nathan P. Podsakoff
5. Scott B. MacKenzie
6. Herman Aguinis

In Marketing

1. Nathan P. Podsakoff
2. Herman Aguinis
3. Jean‐Pascal Gond
4. Philip M. Podsakoff
5. Scott B. MacKenzie
6. Christine M. Moser
7. Ante Glavas
8. Christian M. Ringle

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Philip M. Podsakoff
2. Scott B. MacKenzie
3. Nathan P. Podsakoff
4. J. K. Arnold
5. A. Malshe
6. Christine M. Moser
7. Jean‐Pascal Gond
8. Ante Glavas

Citations in the corpus

• Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences (2016, methodology): “An example of organizing the attributes of a phenomenon into a smaller set of themes and aggregate dimensions is provided by Sonenshein et al. (2014).”
• Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, methodology): “…CSR could jeopardize the possible consolidation of the microfoundational pillars of CSR studies through mixed-methods or multi-methods studies (e.g. Sonenshein et al., 2014), which could benefit from the interpretative power of sociological micro-CSR (e.g. identification of new constructs and…”
• On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work (2019, background): “…only six studies focusing on CSR at the individual level of analysis of incumbent employees that have adopted a qualitative methodological approach (i.e., Bansal, 2003; McShane & Cunningham, 2012; Rodrigo & Arenas, 2008; Rupp & Bell, 2010; Shepherd, Patzelt, & Baron, 2013; Sonenshein et al., 2014).”
• Should I Stay or Should I Go? Identity and Well-Being in Sensemaking About Retention and Turnover (2017, methodology): “Sensegiving has been applied to other issues in organizations (Sonenshein et al., 2014; Weick, 1995) and is part of some models of ideal leadership, including transformational and spiritual leadership (Jackson & Parry, 2011).”