Emotion Regulation in Low-income Preschoolers

By P. Garner, F. M. Spears. 2000

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0393f0a553869a2aeda04a432fd98e10528a0db9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Education

In Pharmacy

Citations in the corpus

Emotions Matter: Making the Case for the Role of Young Children's Emotional Development for Early School Readiness (2002, background): “High-intensity clinical interventions for high-risk children: It is important to note that the majority of children in poverty are doing well, emotionally, and should not be stigmatized or viewed from a deficit-oriented perspective (Garcia Coll, Meyer & Brillon, 1995; Garner & Spears, 2000).”
Dealing with Feelings: How Children Negotiate the Worlds of Emotions and Social Relationships (2007, background): “Conversely, children whose mothers selfreport more frequent anger and tension also are less prosocial, and less well liked than children of more positive mothers (Eisenberg et al., 2001; Eisenberg et al., 2003; Garner & Spears, 2000).”
Arts Enrichment and Preschool Emotions for Low-Income Children at Risk. (2013, background): “Garner and Spears (2000) provided evidence of the many low-income families with appropriate emotional climates, and the links to children’s constructive emotion regulation.”
Modeling maternal emotion-related socialization behaviors in a low-income sample: Relations with toddlers’ self-regulation (2012, background): “As noted previously, Garner and colleagues found that emotion-regulation did not differ between lower-income and middle-income (Garner & Spears, 2000) peers, nor did regulatory responses vary between higher-income and lower-income African American preschoolers (Garner, 2006).”
Preliminary Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Preschool Self-Regulation Assessment (PSRA) for Field-Based Research. (2007, background): “…with lower levels of distress, higher social and academic functioning, and predict greater emotional and behavioral self-control in the future (Chang & Burns, 2005; Garner & Spears, 2000; Miller, Gouley, Seifer, Dickstein, & Shields, 2004; Schultz et al., 2001; Shaw, Keenan, & Vondra, 1994).”
Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. (2006, unknown): “…(2001) Intensity 0.02 34 32 1 1 10 Fullard et al. (1984) Intensity 0.04 161 148 1 1 17 Garner & Power (1996) Intensity 0.00 a 44 38 2 1 1 Garner & Spears (2000) Intensity 0.00 a 46 44 2 1 1 Gunn & Berry (1985) Intensity 0.00 a 21 16 2 1 17 Halpern & Garcia-Coll (2000) Intensity 0.03…”