The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation.

By Dawn S. Carlson, K. Kacmar, L. Wadsworth. 2002

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/030daca440cd9af645d894f1b887f9614a30b77a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Musbah
2. C. Cowton
3. Jana L. Craft
4. David A. Tyfa
5. Leslie Sekerka
6. Lamberto Zollo
7. Richard P. Bagozzi
8. Richard J. Charnigo

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act Decisions (2010, background): “…the greatest support for the impact of magnitude of consequences and social consensus on the ethical decision process (Barnett and Valentine, 2004; Carlson et al., 2002) with significant relationships found between these components and both ethical evaluation (Barnett, 2001; Singer and Singer,…”
• The Impact of Moral Intensity and Desire for Control on Scaling Decisions in Social Entrepreneurship (2016, background): “This component refers to the likelihood that an issue will create evil (or benefits) (Carlson et al. 2002).”
• The Consumers’ Emotional Dog Learns to Persuade Its Rational Tail: Toward a Social Intuitionist Framework of Ethical Consumption (2020, background): “From a rationalist perspective, moral awareness is activated when consumers perceive the “moral intensity” (Carlson et al. 2009) of ethical dilemmas.”
• Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-making: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students (2009, background): “Empirical studies have found the greatest support for the impact of these two dimensions on the ethical decision-making process (Carlson et al., 2002; Barnett and Valentine, 2004).”
• The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, methodology): “Ethical Decision Making Background Ethical decision making is defined as ‘‘a process by which individuals use their moral base to determine whether a certain issue is right or wrong’’ (Carlson et al. 2002, p. 16).”
• Facing Ethical Challenges in the Workplace: Conceptualizing and Measuring Professional Moral Courage (2009, background): “Managers must apply principles of right and wrong to determine what action is appropriate (Carlson, Kacmar, and Wadsworth, 2002).”
• A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011 (2013, background): “Moral Intensity Carlson et al. 2009 JMI Proximity had a significant impact on the moral judgment of a situation such that the closer in proximity an individual was to the situation, the greater the perception of ethicality.”