Methodology for Dealing With Duplicate Study Effects in a Meta-Analysis

By J. Wood. 2008

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02edbfd4657c1518da32adbd159620aa7ffc3f9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

A Meta-Analysis of Interpersonal and Organizational Workplace Deviance Research (2019, methodology): “In addition to the aforementioned inclusion criteria, we carefully ensured that each sample of data was included in our analyses only once because Hunter and Schmidt’s (2004) meta-analytic technique requires an assumption of sample independence (Wood, 2008).”
Personal Selling Elasticities: A Meta-Analysis (2010, background): “Thus, our database includes no duplications or redundant papers (see Wood 2008).”
All Work and No Play? A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Correlates and Outcomes of Workaholism (2016, methodology): “We used the procedures outlined by Wood (2008) to detect duplicate study effects.”
Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta‐analysis (2019, methodology): “For papers based on the same or overlapping samples (Wood, 2008), inclusion preference (in descending order) was given to the sample with further information for testing moderating effects, with a larger sample size, and that has been recently published (Cheng & Chan, 2008).”
A Meta-Analysis of Gifted and Talented Identification Practices (2018, methodology): “Biased parameter estimates associated with multiple effect sizes from the same study, when they are dependent of each other, have often been noted in meta-analysis literature (e.g., Wood, 2008).”
Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact (2009, background): “…(e.g., Hedges & Olkin, 1985; Hunter & Schmidt, 2004) or in any of the articles published in the ORM feature topic on meta-analysis in January 2008 (Aguinis et al., 2008; Bobko & Roth, 2008; Dalton & Dalton, 2008; Kisamore & Brannick, 2008; Schmidt, 2008; Steel & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2008; Wood, 2008).”
Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review (2017, background): “We ensured that no single sample was included twice for a single correlation (Hunter & Schmidt; Wood, 2008).”