Testing an attribution‐of‐blame model of judgments of injustice
By G. Mikula. 2003
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02377f3da6e999cc93e0525e31e1b034c737cf4c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
- T. Okimoto
- Michael Wenzel
- Dong Liu
- Raymond Loi
- Hui Liao
- M. Platow
- Norman T. Feather
- D. van Knippenberg
In Sociology and Political Science
- T. Okimoto
- Michael Wenzel
- Dong Liu
- Raymond Loi
- Hui Liao
- M. Platow
- Norman T. Feather
- D. van Knippenberg
Citations in the corpus
- Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice (2010, background): “As Mikula (2003) argues, an injustice is likely to be perceived when an offender is considered responsible for the violation of another’s entitlement that cannot be justified through other, higher-order ethical motives.”
- The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity (2012, methodology): “Informed by social learning theory and attribution studies (Bandura, 1986; Mikula, 2003), we argue that after observing abusive behaviors of department leaders, team leaders proceed to process”