Methodological Rigor in the Study of Transfer: Identifying L1 Influence in them Interlanguage Lexicon

By Scott Jarvis. 2000

386 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01ca9d379da11d1aa02fce9238d03ecfb24d6940

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue (2006, background): “Weltens 1993), and now even the particular issue of transfer in third language acquisition (Cenoz et al. 2001; Jarvis 2000; Murphy 2003).”
Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German* (2010, methodology): “The theoretical framework for the analysis of event construals is provided by Talmy (1985 et passim), the Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis (Slobin, 1987 et passim) and the Conceptual Transfer Hypothesis (Jarvis, 2007; Jarvis & Pavlenko, 2008), which will be outlined in section 1.2.”
Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English* (2010, neutral): “Note that it will be crucial to study additional language pairings to reliably distinguish cross-linguistic inﬂuence from possible general effects of bilingualism (see Jarvis (2000) for a discussion of the methodological rigor needed to identify true cross-linguistic inﬂuence).”
CROSSLINGUISTIC INFLUENCE AND CONCEPTUAL TRANSFER: WHAT ARE THE CONCEPTS? (2005, background): “The nine studies just cited are especially convincing because all employ a methodology where the learners studied do not all speak the same L1 (cf. Jarvis, 2000).”
TOPIC CONTINUITY IN L2 ENGLISH ARTICLE USE (2002, background): “As part of a larger investigation (see Jarvis, 1998, 2000), the participants were shown the 8-minute “Alone and Hungry” segment of the silent Chaplin film Modern Times, in which a poor young woman attempts to steal a loaf of bread, is arrested, escapes, and is eventually befriended by Chaplin.”
A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition (2018, neutral): “…(i.e., non-primary) language acquisition and processing has long been concerned with the interplay between ‘old’ and ‘new’ linguistic knowledge (an issue already discussed in Weinreich, 1953), both in vocabulary and grammar (e.g., Jarvis, 2000; Odlin, 1989; Schwartz and Sprouse, 1996; White, 2003).”
Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity (2002, background): “…native speakers tend to produce higher levels of LDV than learners do, whereas the potential effects of L1 background on LDV – if they do exist – are much more dif cult to characterize and probably combine with other factors such as age, L2 pro ciency and L1–L2 proximity (compare Jarvis, 2000).”
Cross‐Linguistic Influence (2008, methodology): “After a closer look at the two methods, there will be a discussion of the approach taken by Jarvis (2000), who argues for the need to employ both methods along with additional refinements.”
Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora (2012, methodology): “Paquot (2010) made use of Jarvis’s (2000) unified framework for the study of L1”