A Comparison of Systematic Screening Tools for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

By Kathleen Lynne Lane, M. Little, Amy M. Casey, W. Lambert, J. Wehby, Jessica L. Weisenbach, Andrea Phillips. 2009

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0176dc4d292556cc321a9e19630601d41af8fd75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Kamphaus
2. Katie Eklund
3. Erin Dowdy
4. Susan Antaramian

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Angela Grimm
2. P. Schulz

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. R. Kamphaus
2. Angela Grimm
3. P. Schulz

Citations in the corpus

• Universal Screening for Behavioral and Emotional Risk: A Promising Method for Reducing Disproportionate Placement in Special Education (2012, background): “Overall, evidence suggests that the SSBD is best suited for identifying students with externalizing problems, as opposed to internalizing difficulties such as depressive affect or anxiety (Lane et al., 2009).”
• A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students (2013, background): “Once identified, students who are at risk can be afforded additional supports to prevent the development of more serious symptomatology and potential negative outcomes (Lane et al., 2009).”