Do You have to Pay Attention to Your Feelings to be Influenced by Them?

By Karen Gasper, Gerald L. Clore. 2000

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00a995de54c355b38f77ab155a9b2157d8a525d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

GLOMOsys: A Systems Account of Global Versus Local Processing (2010, background): “Most prominently, in the cognitive tuning-model by Schwarz and Bless (Clore et al., 2001; Gasper & Clore, 2000; Schwarz, 1990; Schwarz & Bless, 1991; Schwarz & Clore, 1996) mood states serve as information (Schwarz & Clore, 1983), apprising individuals of the nature of their current environment.”
The Influence of Affect on Attitude (2005, background): “One implication of their model is that at low levels of thought, increases in attention to one's feelings may increase the role of irrelevant affective influences, whereas further in creases in attention may decrease affective influences (see also Gasper & Clore, 2000; Gohm & Clore, 2000).”
Affect as information: An individual-differences approach. (2002, background): “ Gasper and Clore (2000) included the Attention to Emotion scale of the TMMS in a study of mood and risk estimation.”
Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information (2002, background): “Such reversals have been found for the effects of mood both on judgment (e.g., Gasper & Clore, 1998, 2000; Schwarz & Clore, 1983) and on performance (e.g., Dienes, 1996; Isbell, 1999; Sinclair, Mark, & Clore, 1994).”
Psychological Well-being: Evidence Regarding its Causes and Consequences† (2009, background): “…or neutral mood states, subjects in a positive mood state have a broader focus of attention (“see the bigger picture”) (Fredrickson & Branigan, 2005; Gasper & Clore, 2000), generate more ideas (Fredrickson & Branigan, 2005), and are more creative and flexible in their thinking (Ashby, Isen, &…”
Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: evidence for two judgment processes. (2002, background): “There is considerable support for the idea that women think about and value their emotions to a greater extent (Cross & Madson, 1997; Gasper & Clore, 2000; Robinson & Clore, in press; Shields, 1995).”
Valence and Value (2018, unknown): “Certainly there are measurable differences between people in the extent to which they pay attention to their feelings when responding to stimuli (Gasper & Clore, 2000).”
How mood turns on language. (2006, background): “Indeed, this is a well-tested manipulation (see Gasper & Clore, 1998, 2000; Gendolla & Krusken, 2002; Hirt et al., 1997; Keltner et al., 1993; Schwarz & Clore, 1983; Sinclair et al., 1994).”
Affect as information about liking, efficacy, and importance. (2006, background): “But individuals who habitually attend to their feelings appear especially likely to use them in judgment (Gasper & Clore, 2000).”
Happiness in the Face of Adversity: Reformulating the Dynamic and Modular Bases of Subjective Well-Being (2005, background): “The motto resembles Gergen’s (1994) concept of “valued endpoint” that sums up the story’s essence.”
Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking (2004, background): “Individual differences in the degree to which emotions are attended to also likely impact their effects on risk taking, particularly in experiments involving induction (DeSteno et al., 2000; Gasper & Clore, 2000).”