J. Kramer

Sociology and Political Science · with Ulmer · 2002–2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. Kramer trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Steffensmeier
  2. C. Spohn
  3. Jeffery T. Ulmer

Who trusts J. Kramer overall

  1. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  2. Brian David Johnson
  3. Pauline K. Brennan
  4. D. Steffensmeier
  5. A. Piehl
  6. Stephen Demuth

Papers from J. Kramer's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Kramer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
  2. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  3. MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED
  4. CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1
  5. SEX‐BASED DISPARITIES IN FELONY DISPOSITIONS BEFORE VERSUS AFTER SENTENCING REFORM IN OHIO*
  6. Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners
  7. BILEVEL DISPARITIES IN COURT DISPOSITIONS FOR INTIMATE ASSAULT
  8. DISCRETION AND DISPARITY UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE ROLE OF DEPARTURES AND STRUCTURED SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES*
  9. Does Victim Gender Increase Sentence Severity? Further Explorations of Gender Dynamics and Sentencing Outcomes
  10. Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions

Their papers