The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making
By E. Hazelkorn. 2007
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4dba05260419a9292dfa17ca86ab407738e5efd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Ludo Waltman
- Michael N. Bastedo
- Nicholas A. Bowman
- David Urbano
- Paul F. Wouters
- Robert J. W. Tijssen
- E. Hazelkorn
- Maribel Guerrero
Citations in the corpus
- Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The Experience of Institutional Leaders (2008, background): “Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Articles Centre for Social and Educational Research 2008 Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: the Experience of Institutional Leaders Ellen Hazelkorn Technological University Dublin, ellen.hazelkorn@tudublin.ie Follow this and additional wo”
- Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores (2011, background): “Institutional leaders see rankings and league tables influencing organizational mission, strategy, personnel, recruitment, and public relations—in short, pervading nearly every aspect of the enterprise (Hazelkorn 2007, 2008).”
- Economic Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities' Activities: An Exploratory Study of the United Kingdom (2015, background): “Indirectly or directly, the evidence of this issue is observed in the main differences of budget distribution and in the university indicators or university rankings across countries (Aghion et al., 2010; Hazelkorn, 2007; McCormack et al., 2014).”
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012, background): “ especially since the launch of Academic Ranking of World Universities, also known as the Shanghai Ranking, in 2003, and these rankings nowadays play a significant role in university decision making (Hazelkorn, 2007, 2008). The increased use of university rankings has not been hampered by the method”