Research: increasing value, reducing waste 4 Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research

By A. Chan, F. Song, A. Vickers, Tom Jeff, K. Dickersin, P. Gøtzsche, D. Ghersi, H. B. Worp. 2014

722 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4ccbbdb02706ac48d6acc6c6f072ed3c8d4a580

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Prinsen
2. Paula R. Williamson
3. J. Kirkham
4. C. Terwee
5. Jane M. Blazeby
6. Mike Clarke
7. Heather Bagley
8. Karen L. Barnes

Citations in the corpus

• How to Make More Published Research True (2014, background): “results [23]) has enhanced transparency in clinical trials research and has allowed probing of selective reporting biases [24,25], even if not fully remedying them.”
• The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017, background): “This can lead to the use of ineffective or even harmful interventions, and to the waste of health care resources that are already limited [20].”
• STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016, unknown): “Если протокол исследования не был опубликован, авторы должны указать, у кого его можно получить [115].”