J. Hemphill

Clinical Psychology · 2003–2004

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Clinical Psychology — 11 citations into it; #3,716 of 8,024 by trust here, #6,527 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 10 citations into it; #11,829 of 22,756 by trust here, #17,766 by citations

Whom J. Hemphill trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. P. Lachenbruch
2. Demetra Andrews
3. P. Gendreau
4. Angela S. Book
5. Robert D. Hare
6. J. Bonta
7. Claire Goggin
8. Adelle E. Forth
9. D. Kroner
10. P. Smith

Who trusts J. Hemphill overall

1. T. Milfont
2. René Weber
3. Gilles E. Gignac
4. Brad J. Bushman
5. Lena C. Quilty
6. Arnoldo Téllez
7. Ioannis Tsaousis
8. Emma Onraet
9. Craig A. Anderson
10. Jeffrey T. Hancock

Papers from J. Hemphill's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Hemphill trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions
2. The level of service inventory – revised
3. Is the PCL-R Really the “Unparalleled” Measure of Offender Risk?
4. A Classification Tree Approach to the Development of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment Tools
5. How do psychopaths behave in a prison therapeutic community?
6. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. (American Psychologist)
7. Psychopathy And Treatment Response In Incarcerated Female Substance Abusers
8. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Youth Version.
9. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
10. Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: an international perspective. (Behavioral sciences & the law)

Their papers

• Some Misconceptions about the Hare PCL-R and Risk Assessment (2004) — 92 citations
• Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. (2003) — 1,053 citations