Some Misconceptions about the Hare PCL-R and Risk Assessment

By J. Hemphill, Robert D. Hare. 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc5b344ec4a9d3366087c4266e5e1809319f07df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. J. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Jeffrey T. Hancock
5. Glenn D. Walters
6. S. Porter
7. Michael Woodworth
8. P. Gendreau

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Jeffrey T. Hancock
2. Glenn D. Walters
3. S. Porter
4. Michael Woodworth

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. J. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Jeffrey T. Hancock
5. Glenn D. Walters
6. Susan F. Turner
7. S. Porter
8. Michael Woodworth

Citations in the corpus

• Psychopathy, the PCL-R, and criminal justice: Some new findings and current issues. (2016, unknown): “…of general and violent offending in a variety of contexts as are purpose-built risk tools (Blais & Bonta, 2015; Campbell, French, & Gendreau, 2009; Hemphill & Hare, 2004; Hilton, Harris, Rice, Houghton, & Eke, 2008; Leistico, Salekin, DeCoster, & Rogers, 2008; Mokros, Vohs, & Habermeyer, 2014;…”
• Risk-Appraisal Versus Self-Report in the Prediction of Criminal Justice Outcomes (2006, background): “On the positive side, only studies providing within-sample comparisons (Hemphill & Hare, 2004) between one or more risk-appraisal procedures and one or more self-report surveys were included in this meta-analysis, and then only one estimate per study was combined with correlations from other…”
• The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment (2006, background): “Hare and colleagues are adamant that the PCL-R is not a risk and/or need scale but a diagnostic instrument (Hemphill & Hare, 2004).”
• Development of the California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA): Recidivism Risk Prediction in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2013, methodology): “…offender psychopathy including antisocial, criminal, and psychiatric behavioral issues, and it is known to have “impressive predictive validity” specifically for offenders with mean effect sizes ranging between .20 and .30 (Bonta 2002; Gendreau, Goggin et al. 2002; Hemphill and Hare 2004).”
• Hungry like the wolf: A word‐pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths (2013, methodology): “Psychopathy was measured using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991, 2003), the most extensively used approach to the assessment of psychopathy in forensic samples over the past 20 years (Hemphill & Hare, 2004).”