The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Youth Version.

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Instrumentally Violent Youths (2007, methodology): “There is certainly evidence that changes in the consequences or perceived consequences will change behavior in aggressive adolescents (Foxx, 2003; Stein, 1999). Whether behavioral monitoring and consequation will reduce the willingness of psychopathic youth to engage in goal-directed violence is unk”
Assessment of Reoffense Risk in Adolescents Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses (2009, background): “…the past decade, a number of studies have examined the psychometric properties of this tool (e.g., Dolan & Rennie, 2008; Gretton, Hare, & Catchpole, 2004; Gretton, McBride, Hare, O’Shaughnessy, & Kumka, 2001; Murrie & Cornell, 2002; Welsh et al., 2008; for reviews, see Forth, 2005; Vincent, 2006).”
Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, methodology): “Strong internal psychometric properties of the PCL:YV are summarized in the manual (Forth et al., 2003).”
Factor Structure of Psychopathy in Youth (2006, methodology): “More recently, Forth et al. (2003) noted that three- and fourfactor models fit the data well when using parceled confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models.”