I. Chalmers

Statistics and Probability · 2007–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom I. Chalmers trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Douglas G. Altman

Who trusts I. Chalmers overall

  1. Douglas G. Altman
  2. John P. A. Ioannidis
  3. Paula R. Williamson
  4. P. Glasziou
  5. David Moher
  6. Brittany L. Smith
  7. William R. Hersh
  8. I. Boutron
  9. Gary S. Collins

Papers from I. Chalmers's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers I. Chalmers trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  2. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (PLoS Medicine)
  3. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  4. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. (British medical journal)
  5. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
  6. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. (Health Technology Assessment)
  7. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  8. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  9. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
  10. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)

Their papers