Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

By R. Dworkin, D. Turk, John T. Farrar, J. Haythornthwaite, Mark Jensen, Nathaniel Katz, R. Kerns, G. Stucki, Robert R. Allen, N. Bellamy and 25 more. Pain, 2003

4,126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/485f4a7f14f0b332961b34c8736a02279331ef8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

In Surgery

Douglas G. Altman

Citations in the corpus

Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review (2016, result): “In agreement with the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials recommendations (Dworkin et al., 2005), our outcome measures were pain intensity, depression, anxiety, disability, pain interference, and quality of life.”
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017, methodology): “The IMMPACT recommendations [239] were used as a broad framework for this process.”
Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short‐form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ‐2) (2009, methodology): “Current approaches to the assessment of pain and other patient-reported outcomes require that the first step in developing new measures is to determine what patients themselves consider important [1], an approach that has been endorsed by the United States Food and Drug Administration [47] and by th”
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties (2009, methodology): “Our favorable experience with the use of a numeric rating scale compared to continuous VAS scoring reflects the experience of several other groups [21,22,23] and is in line with the recommendations of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) [24].”
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. (2014, background): “There is a need for standardization of measures across trials so that results can be combined for meta-analyses and for presentation of results in terms of clinical as well as statistical significance (R. H. Dworkin et al., 2005, 2008).”
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012, background): “More than 50 other groups have been working on COS in specific areas of health care, including pain [14], maternity care [15] and some pediatric specialties [16].”