Š. Bahník
Statistics and Probability · 2014–2022
A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 52 citations into it
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 36 citations into it; #7,670 of 9,731 by trust here, #296 by citations
- Social Psychology — 36 citations into it; #12,394 of 15,694 by trust here, #14,665 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 34 citations into it
- General Decision Sciences — 22 citations into it
- Safety Research — 17 citations into it
- Artificial Intelligence — 13 citations into it
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 9 citations into it
Whom Š. Bahník trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Joseph L. Schafer
- S. van Buuren
- Dave Paunesku
- Ting Jiang
- J. Graham
- Karin G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn
- Carol S. Dweck
- Lisa Blackwell
- Florian G. Kaiser
- J. Burnette
Who trusts Š. Bahník overall
Papers from Š. Bahník's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Š. Bahník trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. (Child Development)
- Mind-Set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement (Psychology Science)
- Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. (Psychological bulletin)
- Finding "meaning" in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. (American Psychologist)
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
- Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing (Science)
- Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
- Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
- Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
- An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
Their papers
- Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project (2022) — 1,015 citations
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015) — 7,174 citations
- Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results (2018) — 668 citations
- Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants (2017) — 115 citations
- Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018) — 402 citations
- Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis (2021) — 114 citations
- Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior (2019) — 88 citations
- Registered Replication Report (2014) — 129 citations