David Xiaosong Peng

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · with Lai · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 27 researchers and is trusted by 26 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 10 citations into it; #1,011 of 8,741 by trust here, #2,109 by citations
• Management Information Systems — 9 citations into it
• Information Systems and Management — 8 citations into it; #305 of 3,842 by trust here, #565 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 8 citations into it
• Strategy and Management — 6 citations into it
• Communication — 5 citations into it
• Food Science — 5 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 5 citations into it

Whom David Xiaosong Peng trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. M. Stone
2. S. Geisser
3. Adamantios Diamantopoulos
4. Rachna Shah
5. Richard Klein
6. Mei Cao
7. Wynne W. Chin
8. Cheryl Burke Jarvis
9. J. Chris White
10. Oliver Götz

Who trusts David Xiaosong Peng overall

1. Christian M. Ringle
2. Marko Sarstedt
3. Rameshwar Dubey
4. Mikko Rönkkö
5. Jörg Henseler
6. Ned Kock
7. Angappa Gunasekaran
8. Edward E. Rigdon
9. Genshu Lu
10. Joseph F. Hair

Papers from David Xiaosong Peng's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers David Xiaosong Peng trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development
2. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research
3. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources (DATB)
4. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study (Information systems research)
5. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research (MIS Q.)
6. PLS: A Silver Bullet?
7. Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet?
8. Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration
9. Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling
10. Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research (MIS Q.)

Their papers

• Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research (2012) — 1,583 citations