David R. Jones
Statistics and Probability · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · 2000–2008
A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 39 citations into it; #5,464 of 12,932 by trust here, #395 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 8 citations into it
- Artificial Intelligence — 7 citations into it
- Surgery — 5 citations into it
Whom David R. Jones trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- A. Sutton
- J. Sterne
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- Richard L. Tweedie
- N. Terrin
- Petra Macaskill
- Matthias Egger
- S. Thompson
Who trusts David R. Jones overall
Papers from David R. Jones's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers David R. Jones trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
- Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
- General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
- Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example (Journal of Health Services Research and Policy)
- Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between‐study heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
Their papers
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS (2005) — 533 citations
- Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000) — 1,399 citations
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. (2008) — 1,832 citations
- Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between‐study heterogeneity (2007) — 688 citations
- Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. (2006) — 2,094 citations
- How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006) — 895 citations
- Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005) — 1,229 citations