Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.

By R. Campbell, P. Pound, Catherine Pope, N. Britten, R. Pill, M. Morgan, J. Donovan. Social Science & Medicine (1967), 2003

999 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e62c219bd09986ad6fe6f99e8edfd84efff41c65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

1. M. Sandelowski
2. K. Jones
3. A. Sutton
4. S. Thorne
5. G. Noblit
6. M. Kearney
7. L. Jensen

In General Health Professions

1. K. Jones
2. M. Sandelowski
3. S. Downe
4. D. Walsh
5. Jonathan A. Smith
6. Andrew Booth
7. S. Thorne
8. Helen Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. (2005, methodology): “We used the meta-ethnographic approach developed by Noblit and Hare (1988) and adopted by Britten et al. (2002) and Campbell et al. (2003).”
• Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research (2007, methodology): “Qualitative research synthesis in the health sciences, generally using the models of Noblit and Hare (1988), have been reported by Beck (2001), Campbell et al. (2003), and Jensen and Allen (1994).”
• Patient engagement in research: a systematic review (2014, methodology): “[http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/11/CASP-Qualitative-Research-Checklist-31.05.13.pdf] 19.”
• Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure (2009, background): “Usually, metasynthesis initially selects studies and then identifies key metaphors, ideas, concepts, and relations in each one (Nelson, 2006; see also Campbell et al., 2003; Noblit & Hare, 1988).”
• Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. (2011, background): “, 1999136 USA 21 (17), aged 65–92 years, Caucasian, retired Local emergency centres and physicians’ offices Antihypertensive medicine Semi-structured interviews”
• Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. (2005, methodology): “In a later publication, however, the same team (Campbell et al. 2003) argue strongly for evaluating studies first.”
• Mission Drift in Qualitative Research, or Moving Toward a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies, Moving Back to a More Systematic Narrative Review. (2004, methodology): “They see the approach ‘as perhaps the best developed method for synthesising qualitative data, and one which clearly had its origins in the interpretivist paradigm from which most methods of primary qualitative research evolved’ (Campbell et al., 2003, p. 673).”
• How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006, methodology): “We aimed to compare narrative review, meta-ethnography (based on work by Britten et al., 2002; Campbell et al., 2003; and Noblit and Hare, 1988) and Bayesian meta-analysis (based on Roberts et al., 2002).”
• Improving response rates using a monetary incentive for patient completion of questionnaires: an observational study (2007, neutral): “Methods for reviewing qualitative research in a systematic way are still emerging, and there is much ongoing development and debate [11-14].”