Laura J. Damschroder

General Health Professions · 2009–2022

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 14 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Health Professions — 105 citations into it; #602 of 4,781 by trust here, #359 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 25 citations into it; #11,791 of 11,946 by trust here, #5,787 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 20 citations into it; #11,356 of 22,756 by trust here, #2,977 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 14 citations into it

Whom Laura J. Damschroder trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. P. Nilsen
2. Byron J. Powell
3. Susan Michie
4. T. Waltz
5. Katherine J Klein
6. Carl R. May
7. Enola K. Proctor
8. A. Kazdin
9. Russell E. Glasgow
10. Amy C. Edmondson

Who trusts Laura J. Damschroder overall

1. P. Nilsen
2. Byron J. Powell
3. S. Landes
4. C. Lewis
5. Enola K. Proctor
6. Justin D. Smith
7. Sacha A. McBain
8. David A. Chambers
9. M. Bauer
10. Maria E. Fernandez

Papers from Laura J. Damschroder's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Laura J. Damschroder trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method (Implementation science : IS)
2. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda (Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research)
3. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (Implementation Science)
4. Towards a general theory of implementation (Implementation Science)
5. Welcome to Implementation Science (Implementation Science)
6. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach (BMJ Quality & Safety)
7. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
8. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. (Milbank Quarterly)
9. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science (Implementation science : IS)
10. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. (Milbank Quarterly)

Their papers

• Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science (2009) — 11,950 citations
• A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project (2015) — 3,826 citations
• A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (2015) — 1,130 citations
• Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions (2019) — 805 citations
• Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (2020) — 552 citations
• The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback (2022) — 3,124 citations
• Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research. (2020) — 321 citations
• Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration (2019) — 703 citations
• An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist (2015) — 1,642 citations
• Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study (2015) — 851 citations