Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research.

By Laura J. Damschroder. Psychiatry Research, 2020

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Implementation science has been recognized as a potential catalyst for health system reform, in part, because of its contribution of well-grounded conceptual theories, often encapsulated in frameworks. Well-designed frameworks provide a semantic structure, a common language by which to guide systematic approaches to studying implementation and testing interventions. An overview of the types and roles of theory in advancing implementation science is offered in this article. Resources for selecting appropriate frameworks are described along with illustrative examples. The case is made that well-developed theory is what enables knowledge to emerge out of seeming chaos and for translation of that knowledge to be widely and reliably implemented into routine practice so that health and well-being of patients is maximized by delivery of interventions that are rooted in that knowledge.

Subfields: General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/688609d6d4ad75ef0e1dce1d0ad74e0bf58f6d16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. Geoffrey Curran
  2. Sacha A. McBain
  3. S. Landes
  4. C. Reardon
  5. Julie C. Lowery
  6. M. Widerquist
  7. Dennis H. Li
  8. Justin D. Smith

Citations in the corpus