Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

By R. Grol, Marije Bosch, Marlies Hulscher, M. Eccles, M. Wensing. Milbank Quarterly, 2007

905 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eab5003b1bbc66b5d1cbff3719f093bdd6bc5810

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Towards a general theory of implementation (2013, methodology): “For the research community, applied research in this domain forms a focus for the new interdisciplinary field of ‘Implementation Science’ [5], a nd the development of implementation theory [6,7] that provides a foundation for understanding, designi ng, predicting, and evaluating dynamic implementati”
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process (2015, neutral): “Leaders in the field were working to consolidate the evidence for a science of improvement,(2,3) and without guidance on how to write their findings, authors struggled to report their improvement work in a reliable and consistent way.(4,5) These factors influenced the initial publication in 2008 of ”
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science (2009, background): “Complexity is also increased with higher numbers of potential target organizational units (teams, clinics, departments) or types of people (providers, patients, managers) targeted by the intervention [34], and the degree to which the intervention will alter central work processes [23].”
Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model (2007, neutral): “(ii) Intention and volition: The mental components of individual behaviour, especially the cognitions and intentions that might dispose individuals to adopt a complex intervention [23,24], are the proper domain of psychological theory.”
From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science (2018, background): “To improve outcomes of implementation efforts, the field needs testable theories that describe the causal pathways through which implementation strategies function (6, 9).”
Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework (2012, neutral): “Multiple theories and frameworks of individual and organisational behaviour change exist [14-16], and choosing an appropriate theory for designing implementation interventions is challenging [16-18].”
Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures (2013, background): “As a number of scholars have noted, researchers currently face significant challenges in measuring implementationrelated phenomena [5-7].”
Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence (2017, background): “A consistent finding in articles on quality improvement in healthcare is that change is difficult to achieve, and can be challenging to sustain [41].”
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (2010, background): “The Exploration Phase involves awareness of either an issue that needs attention or of an improved approach to an organizational challenge (Grol et al. 2007).”
Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: a systematic review of reviews (2014, background): “[44] found that empirical evidence of the effective-”
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting (2013, background): “They must tackle a myriad of barriers to evidence-based care [59,60] and the various properties of interventions that make them more or less amenable to implementation [52].”