Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach

By Susan Michie, Marie Johnston, C. Abraham, R. Lawton, D. Parker, A. Walker. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2005

3,113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdf39eabaf7691033bd0ad16d7d7fa59c92141a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes (2019, methodology): “Determinant categories (underlined categories are associated with contextual determinants and/or are labelled “context”) Contextual determinants: categories and examples of sub-categories in the framework implementation of the innovation; extent to which colleagues implement the innovation (modellin”
The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011, positive): “Whilst this framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems [9], the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and therefore underused in its application.”
From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques (2008, background): “…psychology, primary care, public health, epidemiology, and health services research rated their confidence in replicating even a very high standard protocol (US Diabetes Prevention Program, 2001) to be 1.7 (on a scale of 1 to 5) (Michie et al., 2005a; Michie, Johnston, Francis, & Hardeman, 2005b).”
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback (2022, background): “, the TDF [63, 64], the Theory of Planned Behavior [65], or the Social Ecological Theory [66] may provide constructs relevant for Innovation Recipients and Innovation Deliverers.”
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012, methodology): “To overcome such problems, an integrative framework of theories of behaviour change was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists [13].”
Gamification: What It Is and Why It Matters to Digital Health Behavior Change Developers (2013, neutral): “Within this debate, I take the view that technology is only persuasive when it employs specific behavior change ingredients, as one of the key principles of evidence based behavioral medicine [5-7].”
Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analysis (2011, background): “Authors have suggested that the nature of these similarities or differences amongst behaviours may be important moderators of the ease with which we can predict or change them (e.g., Johnston & Dixon, 2008; McEachan et al., 2010; Michie et al., 2005).”
Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework (2012, neutral): “Questions were designed to explore the domains from the TDF for each of the two behaviours.”
Behavior Change Techniques and Their Mechanisms of Action: A Synthesis of Links Described in Published Intervention Literature (2018, methodology): “To guide our coding, we drew on a set of 26 general MoAs; these were the 14 domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework [27] and the 12 additional most frequent MoA constructs from a set of 83 theories of behavior change [31] (see Appendix F of Supplementary File 2 for a full list of these 26 MoA”
An Exploratory Study of “Quantitative Linguistic Feedback” (2013, background): “…that incorporating these theoretically based behavior change techniques into health promotion interventions is essential to stimulating sustainable behaviorchange and advancing the science of behavior change (Abraham & Michie, 2008; Michie et al., 2005; Michie, Jochelson, Markham, & Bridle, 2009).”
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017, background): “In an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation, a team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers [15].”
Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014, methodology): “Actions may be overt (motor or verbal) and directly measurable or, covert (activities not viewable but involving voluntary muscles) and indirectly measurable; behaviours are physical events that occur in the body and are controlled by the brain’.”