L. Zebrowitz

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2001–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 27 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Cognitive Neuroscience — 65 citations into it; #3,943 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,396 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 60 citations into it; #1,671 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,782 by citations
• Social Psychology — 27 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 26 citations into it; #17,109 of 22,756 by trust here, #15,556 by citations
• Marketing — 12 citations into it; #1,978 of 6,289 by trust here, #3,201 by citations
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 9 citations into it

Whom L. Zebrowitz trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Gillian Rhodes
2. J. Langlois
3. J. Montepare
4. John P. O'Doherty
5. Elizabeth A. Phelps
6. Irene V. Blair
7. G. Johansson
8. Joel S. Winston
9. James V. Haxby
10. Ian Penton-Voak

Who trusts L. Zebrowitz overall

1. Christopher Y. Olivola
2. Alexander Todorov
3. Gillian Rhodes
4. Daniel J. Kruger
5. Mark Schaller
6. J. Samochowiec
7. Steven W. Gangestad
8. J. Montepare
9. Nikolaas N. Oosterhof
10. David S. Pedulla

Papers from L. Zebrowitz's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Zebrowitz trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (Psychological bulletin)
2. Attractive Faces Are Only Average
3. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
4. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)
5. Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation (Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience)
6. The distributed human neural system for face perception. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
7. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. (Annual Review of Psychology)
8. Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health
9. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes (Science)
10. Changes in emotion after circumscribed surgical lesions of the orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. (Brain : a journal of neurology)

Their papers

• A social-developmental view of ageism. (2002) — 88 citations
• THE CONTRIBUTION OF FACE FAMILIARITY TO INGROUP FAVORITISM AND STEREOTYPING (2007) — 117 citations
• First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest (2012) — 87 citations
• Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. (2008) — 629 citations
• Finally, faces find favor (2006) — 134 citations
• The Ecological Approach to Person Perception: Evolutionary Roots and Contemporary Offshoots. (2006) — 112 citations
• Appearance DOES Matter (2005) — 131 citations
• Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health (2004) — 221 citations
• Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and their Origins (2002) — 295 citations
• Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives (2001) — 171 citations