The distributed human neural system for face perception.

By J. V. Haxby, E. Hoffman, Maria Ida Gobbini. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000

4,908 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88779104d045f4f319d17184368ee12431a0ce82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Citations in the corpus

Different Neural Mechanisms within Occipitotemporal Cortex Underlie Repetition Suppression across Same and Different-Size Faces (2012, neutral): “Keywords: adaptation, DCM, face-processing, fMRI, predictive-coding”
Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces (2004, positive): “Whereas the early responses appear to reflect a rapid feed-forward process that does not reflect familiarity, the later responses occur in a time window that allows interactions among multiple face-responsive regions (Haxby et al., 2000).”
A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: implications for neuropsychological models of aging. (2008, background): “Moreover, there is not a single neural event in a single brain region, but different neural circuits being activated at different times as processing of an emotion stimulus takes place over time (Haxby et al., 2000; Vuilleumier and Pourtois, 2007).”
Ballot Photographs as Cues in Low-Information Elections (2008, background): “Candidate appearance cues should be a familiar tool to voters because citizens typically make judgments on the basis of personal appearances in daily social interactions to facilitate communication (see Haxby et al. 2000).”
Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex (2003, background): “The other three panels show the delay observed with inversion at the level of the VPP for each object category. these occipital differences probably do not reflect neural operations that have become specialized for aspects of linguistic vs nonlinguistic patterns, but rather differences related to…”
Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? (2008, neutral): “…of California at Berkeley D 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20:12, pp. 2125–2136 D o w n l o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / m i t p r c . s i l v e r c h a i r . c o m / j o c n / a r t i c l e - p d f / 2 0 / 1 2 / 2 1 2 5 / 1 7 5 9 3 1 7 / j o c n .”
Decline or improvement?: Age-related differences in facial expression recognition (2007, background): “The results are plausible considering that facial expression recognition is visuospatial in nature (Buitelaar et al., 1999; Haxby et al., 2000) and may preferentially involve the right hemisphere (Damasio et al.”
Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala (2011, background): “Facial Features Represented in the Amygdala Building on theoretical models [16] as well as findings from responses to faces in temporal neocortex that provides input to the amygdala [17, 18], several studies have asked what aspects of faces might be represented in the amygdala.”
Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. (2002, background): “…Section 9.2), perhaps a reflection of differences in processing two aspects of structural information: that which specifies relatively rigid, unchanging configurations of features and that which specifies more dynamic, changeable configurations, respectively (Haxby et al., 2000) (cf. Figure 1).”
Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI study (2006, positive): “In concert with our findings, this region is also associated with social cognition— social schema, perceptions of social signs, and the mental states of others (Adolphs, 1999; Haxby et al., 2000).”