THE CONTRIBUTION OF FACE FAMILIARITY TO INGROUP FAVORITISM AND STEREOTYPING

By L. Zebrowitz, P. Matthew Bronstad, Hoon Lee, Aviva Androphy, Shayna L. Skelley, Naomi Skop, Rebecca Wienerman, Glenn Landauer. 2007

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d78c6260a68cb949de6899a0e5180b8e85f8eca4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Christopher Y. Olivola
2. Ron Dotsch
3. Peter Mende-Siedlecki
4. Alexander Todorov
5. Nikolaas N. Oosterhof
6. M. Petersen
7. Lasse Laustsen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Christopher Y. Olivola
2. Ron Dotsch
3. Peter Mende-Siedlecki
4. Alexander Todorov
5. Nikolaas N. Oosterhof
6. M. Petersen
7. Lasse Laustsen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christopher Y. Olivola
2. Peter Mende-Siedlecki
3. Ron Dotsch
4. Alexander Todorov

Citations in the corpus

• Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. (2015, background): “Greater familiarity with one’s in-group can also shift the perceived typicality of faces and can partially explain in-group face preferences (Zebrowitz et al. 2007, 2008).”
• Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. (2008, unknown): “Here we describe how hypotheses derived from an ecological approach to social perception provide insights into social psychological face perception and the role of facial appearance in impression formation.”