Natalie Jomini Stroud

Sociology and Political Science · 2013–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 17 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Natalie Jomini Stroud trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. R. Kelly Garrett
  2. Tien-Tsung Lee
  3. Kristopher J Preacher
  4. William P. Eveland
  5. Andrew F. Hayes
  6. Yariv Tsfati
  7. Lauren A. Feldman
  8. Dhavan V. Shah
  9. J. Krosnick
  10. David P. Redlawsk

Who trusts Natalie Jomini Stroud overall

  1. Miriam J. Metzger
  2. Michael A. Beam
  3. Magdalena E. Wojcieszak
  4. Ethan Hartsell
  5. S. van der Linden
  6. Andrew J. Flanagin
  7. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick
  8. Dag Wollebæk
  9. Myiah J. Hutchens
  10. Ariel Hasell

Papers from Natalie Jomini Stroud's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Natalie Jomini Stroud trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
  2. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
  3. The case for motivated reasoning.
  4. Reinforcement of the Political Self Through Selective Exposure to Political Messages
  5. Negative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor Variables
  6. Selective Exposure and Reinforcement of Attitudes and Partisanship Before a Presidential Election
  7. Fear, anger, and risk. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  8. Ideological Segregation Online and Offline
  9. Do People Watch what they Do Not Trust? (Communication Research)
  10. Does Audience Skepticism of the Media Matter in Agenda Setting?

Their papers