Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro‐ and Counterattitudinal News Consumption

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Facebook news and (de)polarization: reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election (2018, background): “…has shown that individuals do see counter-attitudinal views in news feeds (Bakshy et al., 2015; Beam, 2014; Flaxman et al., 2016; Garrett, 2009; Garrett & Stroud, 2014; Gentzkow & Shapiro, 2011; Messing & Westwood, 2014), this would suggest that social media news use could result in…”
Selective use of news cues: : A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments (2016, background): “In an experiment about political content, Garrett and Stroud (2014) presented headlines with bar graphics that (ostensibly) indicated the amount of pro and con information: The likelihood of selection was positively related to the (graphic) amount of consistent information, but there was no…”
Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems (2018, background): “The level of attraction to different ideas depends on the personal taste and psychological attributes of each consumer (e.g., Garrett & Stround, 2014).”
Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media (2016, background): “We know that when given a choice, audiences prefer attitude-consistent sources, although they do not actively avoid the other side (Garrett & Stroud, 2014).”