Perceptions of Cable News Credibility

By Natalie Jomini Stroud, Jae Kook Lee. 2013

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/428984573ac8beee74de010a328945f78dcc8475

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Andrew J. Flanagin
2. S. van der Linden
3. Miriam J. Metzger
4. J. Roozenbeek
5. Ethan Hartsell
6. C. Roberts
7. Ward van Zoonen
8. Toni G.L.A. van der Meer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Roozenbeek
2. S. van der Linden
3. Miriam J. Metzger
4. Andrew J. Flanagin
5. Ethan Hartsell
6. Costas Panagopoulos
7. Stephan Lewandowsky
8. C. Roberts

Citations in the corpus

• News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information Seeking (2015, background): “For example, perceived news credibility has been observed as a mediating variable for cable news consumption (Stroud & Lee, 2013).”
• You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news (2020, background): “These findings coincide with prior research which shows that liberal Democrats are more likely than conservative Republicans to indicate that neither outlet is particularly credible (Stroud and Lee, 2013).”
• Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News (2020, background): “Stroud and Lee (2013) found that credibility perceptions for cable news channels mediated the relationship between political party identification and exposure to partisan news.”