Assessing Selective Exposure in Experiments: The Implications of Different Methodological Choices

By Lauren A. Feldman, Natalie Jomini Stroud, Bruce Bimber, Magdalena E. Wojcieszak. 2013

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de94bce3831e1094cf05aeceea75381d5ffd389e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Andrew J. Flanagin
2. Miriam J. Metzger
3. Ethan Hartsell
4. Natalie Jomini Stroud
5. Magdalena E. Wojcieszak
6. Bruce Bimber
7. Lauren A. Feldman
8. C. Roberts

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Natalie Jomini Stroud
2. Magdalena E. Wojcieszak
3. Bruce Bimber
4. Miriam J. Metzger
5. Andrew J. Flanagin
6. Lauren A. Feldman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Miriam J. Metzger
2. Andrew J. Flanagin
3. Ethan Hartsell
4. Natalie Jomini Stroud
5. Magdalena E. Wojcieszak
6. Lauren A. Feldman
7. C. Roberts
8. Ward van Zoonen

Citations in the corpus

• Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News (2020, methodology): “Similar “forced exposure” designs have a long history in selective exposure research (see Fischer & Greitemeyer, 2010) and have been employed in recent studies as well (e.g., Arceneaux, Johnson, & Murphy, 2012; Coe et al., 2008; Feldman et al., 2013).”
• Partisan News and Political Participation: Exploring Mediated Relationships (2016, methodology): “Those who reported truly neutral attitudes (N = 333) were excluded from the analysis (see Feldman et al., 2013).”