A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations

1,426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. (2007, methodology): “Rutter and Gatsonis (2001) allowed all five parameters of the HSROC model to differ between the three imaging techniques.”
Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016, neutral): “Here, the Rutter and Gatsonis mixed effects model [26] was fitted to estimate the SROC curve, and the sensitivity and specificity of each study, weighted by study size were plotted in the ROC space.”
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. (2005, methodology): “The statistical shortcomings of the sROC approach have been described before [11,13,36] Rutter et al.”
d-Dimer for the Exclusion of Acute Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism (2004, methodology): “Similar models have been applied to Bayesian meta-analysis of receiveroperating characteristic curves (11).”