M. Gailliot

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2006–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 32 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Gailliot trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Roy F. Baumeister
  2. Mark Muraven
  3. Kathleen D. Vohs
  4. Wayne C. Drevets
  5. Joel A. Michael
  6. E. A. Plant
  7. Elisaveta Slessareva
  8. Patricia G. Devine
  9. B. Schmeichel
  10. Jon K. Maner

Who trusts M. Gailliot overall

  1. Roy F. Baumeister
  2. Martin S. Hagger
  3. Kathleen D. Vohs
  4. C. Nathan DeWall
  5. E. Wan
  6. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
  7. Chantelle Wood
  8. Eli J. Finkel
  9. V. Job
  10. Wilhelm Hofmann

Papers from M. Gailliot's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Gailliot trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Intellectual performance and ego depletion: role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  2. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? (Psychological bulletin)
  3. Mechanisms of Self-Control Failure: Motivation and Limited Resources (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  4. Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
  5. The Cultural Animal
  6. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice
  7. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
  8. Self-regulation and self-presentation: regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  9. If you can't join them, beat them: effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  10. THE EMPIRICAL STATUS OF GOTTFREDSON AND HIRSCHI'S GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME: A META‐ANALYSIS

Their papers