Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice

By E. A. Plant, Patricia G. Devine. 1998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection (2019, background): “1672 could buffer stereotype use, which could in turn influence annotator responses (Plant and Devine, 1998; Moskowitz and Li, 2011).”
Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. (2010, background): “For example, individuals are motivated to avoid acting prejudiced for different reasons: some are mostly internally motivated and want to avoid feeling prejudiced, whereas others are mostly externally motivated and care more about avoiding appearing prejudiced to others (Plant & Devine, 1998).”
Women in Academic Science (2014, background): “…bias, given what is known about the reluctance to express prejudice in public: People are aware of the social norms against expressing prejudice in public situations, so they suppress their private bias, or express it in more subtle ways (e.g., Crosby, Bromley, & Saxe, 1980; Plant & Devine, 1998).”
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. (2003, background): “In the JSM, suppression is an externally or internally motivated attempt to reduce the expression or awareness of prejudice (cf. E. A. Plant & Devine, 1998).”
Social Justice in Our Minds, Homes, and Society: The Nature, Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias (2004, background): “The result has been an apparent sea change with respect to stereotypes and prejudice, marked by a dramatic decrease in their overt expression (Juddet al., 1995; Schuman et al., 1997), and an increase in normative pressures to be nonprejudiced (Dunton and Fazio, 1997; Plant and Devine, 1998).”
Collective Action in Modern Times: How Modern Expressions of Prejudice Prevent Collective Action (2009, background): “Nowadays, people tend to refrain from overtly expressing such blatantly prejudicial beliefs (Plant & Devine, 1998).”
Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't) (2006, background): “Motivations to respond without prejudice (Plant & Devine, 1998) also predicted theories of racism.”
Responses to other-imposed pro-black pressure: Acceptance or backlash? (2001, background): “…and predictive validity.1 They also found 1 Although presenting all the validation work is beyond the scope of this article, it is worth noting that Plant and Devine (1998) found that their IMS measure was strongly related to traditional measures of racial attitudes, such as Brigham’s (1993)…”
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention (2012, methodology): “The explicit measures included established measures of racial attitudes (Brigham, 1993), the sources of one's motivation for responding without prejudice (Plant & Devine, 1998), and whether one believes one's own behavior is more biased than appropriate (Monteith & Voils, 1998).”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “In the case of prejudice-related behavior, people who are motivated to behave in an unbiased fashion because of their conscious egalitarian values or contemporary social norms may be particularly vigilant in intergroup settings and particularly motivated to correct any appearance of bias (Dunton and”
The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength (2007, background): “The more confident that people are in the validity of an object more accessible this confidence is, the more they are likely to report the attitude on a deliberative measure, and the more likely this attitude is to be durable and .”
Failure to warn: How student race affects warnings of potential academic difficulty ☆ (2007, unknown): “The two subscales are fairly orthogonal to one another, and yield relatively high scores in college populations—participants seem concerned with prejudice as a violation both of their personal values and of social norms (Plant & Devine, 1998).”