Gillian Lancaster

Statistics and Probability · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 20 citations into it; #7,340 of 12,932 by trust here, #4,371 by citations
• Education — 7 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 6 citations into it; #17,339 of 23,481 by trust here, #13,168 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 6 citations into it

Whom Gillian Lancaster trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Joan Garfield
2. E. von Elm
3. Douglas G. Altman
4. Michael Campbell
5. Dani Ben-Zvi
6. Tammy Hoffmann
7. C. Cooper
8. Matthias Egger
9. P. Craig

Who trusts Gillian Lancaster overall

1. S. Eldridge
2. D. Almirall
3. Michael Campbell
4. S. Billingham
5. Amy L Whitehead
6. Lehana Thabane
7. Scott N. Compton
8. C. Cooper
9. Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel
10. J. Sim

Papers from Gillian Lancaster's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gillian Lancaster trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
2. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. (Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice)
3. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. (Archives of General Psychiatry)
4. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance
5. Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. (The Lancet)
6. Statistical Literacy as a Goal for Introductory Statistics Courses
7. Adults' Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, Responsibilities
8. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
9. The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking
10. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy (BMC Medical Research Methodology)

Their papers

• Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. (2004) — 2,493 citations
• Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework (2016) — 1,273 citations
• What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy (2010) — 1,450 citations
• Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies (2019) — 372 citations
• Statistical Education in the 21st Century: A Review of Challenges, Teaching Innovations and Strategies for Reform (2012) — 204 citations