Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance

By P. Craig, Paul A. Dieppe, Sally J Macintyre, Susan Michie, I. Nazareth, M. Petticrew. 2006

898 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d192ce71a3ff5f1818165fec141a11ca6f76a37f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Gillian Lancaster
2. Michael Campbell
3. M. Arain
4. C. Cooper
5. Louis Major
6. B. Haßler
7. S. Richards
8. A. Dickens

Citations in the corpus

• What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy (2010, methodology): “We may expect that trials will increasingly be used to evaluate 'complex interventions'[8,9].”
• Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes (2016, background): “Globally, while educational technologies can be considered “complex interventions”, and generating evidence in such a context is often difficult (Craig et al., 2008), future work is encouraged to move beyond the exploratory and to offer a thorough investigation that counters the observed trend of co”
• Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011, background): “The inclusion of rigorous process evaluations within trials may also shed light on the mechanisms through which social isolation may be reduced [94].”