C. Cooper
Statistics and Probability · with Campbell · 2010–2015
A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 8 citations into it; #10,837 of 12,932 by trust here, #8,279 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 5 citations into it
Whom C. Cooper trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts C. Cooper overall
Papers from C. Cooper's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Cooper trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. (Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice)
- Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
- Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study (Trials)
- Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. (Archives of General Psychiatry)
- Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance
- Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. (The Lancet)
- What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. (Research in Nursing and Health)
Their papers
- What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy (2010) — 1,450 citations
- Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable (2015) — 1,637 citations
- Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study (2011) — 110 citations