Sabine Trepte

Sociology and Political Science · 2012–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Sabine Trepte trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Dmitri Williams
  2. Nicole B. Ellison
  3. Kristopher J Preacher
  4. Kenneth A. Bollen
  5. David A. Cole
  6. Charles W. Steinfield
  7. Yair Amichai-Hamburger
  8. Jessica Vitak
  9. Andrew F. Hayes
  10. Natalya N. Bazarova

Who trusts Sabine Trepte overall

  1. Nazanin Andalibi
  2. Grace N. Rivera
  3. Endrit Kromidha
  4. Tobias Dienlin
  5. Juho Hamari

Papers from Sabine Trepte's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Sabine Trepte trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work)
  2. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites (J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.)
  3. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. (Journal of Abnormal Psychology)
  4. On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era (J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.)
  5. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis
  6. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
  7. Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships
  8. Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook (J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.)
  9. In Defense of the Internet: The Relationship between Internet Communication and Depression, Loneliness, Self-Esteem, and Perceived Social Support (Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking)
  10. To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits

Their papers