Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors

By Tobias Dienlin, Sabine Trepte. 2015

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Communication, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

BLENDER: Enabling Local Search with a Hybrid Differential Privacy Model (2017, background): “As others have observed [2, 1, 7], people’s attitudes toward privacy vary widely.”
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “Thus, when a new methodological approach was followed the privacy paradox was dissolved (Dienlin and Trepte, 2015).”
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Privacy concerns in chatbot interactions (neutral): “While, as stated in the “ privacy paradox ” , perceived privacy risks do not automatically translate into not disclosing information online [4, 14], several scholars found privacy concerns and information disclosure to be related [5].”
Explicating the privacy paradox: A qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers (2020, background): “This anomaly, by which consumers behave contrary to their privacy attitudes or stated privacy concerns, is widely known as the privacy paradox (Dienlin and Trepte, 2015; Norberg et al., 2007).”
The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review (2017, background): “…when distinguishing between privacy concerns and attitudes, applying the appropriate theory to the problem in question (here TPB) and differentiating on the above mentioned privacy dimension, the authors consider the privacy paradox as ‘a relic of the past’ (p. 295; Dienlin and Trepte, 2015).”