To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits
By T. Little, W. Cunningham, Golan Shahar, K. Widaman. 2002
6,399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/039a2c25252d2d536375908d9a3392d83028a50e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Daniel A. Sass
- Robert J. Vandenberg
- Eldad Davidov
- Christian Vandenberghe
- P. Parker
- Zhonglin Wen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- M. Tims
- Daantje Derks
- Sabine Sonnentag
- M. Westman
- Patti M. Valkenburg
Citations in the corpus
- Examining Individual and Ecological Predictors of the Self-Determination of Students with Disabilities (2007, methodology): “Parceling introduces advances over itemlevel modeling, including greater parsimony, fewer chances for correlated residuals or dual loadings of indicators, and reductions in sampling error (Little et al., 2002).”
- Transformational leadership and innovation in an R&D organization experiencing major change (2013, background): “This approach reduces sources of sampling error, and is particularly beneficial when the number of items is high relative to the sample size (Little et al., 2002).”
- Re-examining the relationships among perceived quality, value, satisfaction, and destination loyalty (2018, background): “Using the first-order reflective constructs to operationalize quality in this case can lead to empirical bias and create measurement errors (see Little et al., 2002).”