Remco Heesen
Statistics and Probability · 2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 9 citations into it
Whom Remco Heesen trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Michael Weisberg
- Daniele Fanelli
- Lutz Bornmann
- Thorsten Gruber
- Jennifer Saul
- Christian List
- Brian A. Nosek
Papers from Remco Heesen's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Remco Heesen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Scientific peer review (Annual Review of Information Science and Technology)
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (PLoS ONE)
- Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
- Bias in peer review (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Academic sell-out: how an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia
- Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor* (Philosophia Scientiæ)
- Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy
- Why So Slow The Advancement Of Women
- Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem
- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Their papers
- Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2020) — 112 citations