James Thomas
Statistics and Probability · British medical journal · 2010–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 169 citations into it
Whom James Thomas trusts
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- David Moher (in Statistics and Probability)
- Douglas G. Altman (in Statistics and Probability)
- J. McKenzie (in Statistics and Probability)
Papers from James Thomas's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers James Thomas trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (British medical journal)
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PLoS ONE)
Their papers
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 10,812 citations
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020) — 3,632 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 94,440 citations
- A web-based tool for adjusting costs to a specific target currency and price year (2010) — 353 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) — 3,176 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) — 25,061 citations
- Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis (2019) — 368 citations